The self-made man is a figure that embodies the dream of those who want to achieve success starting from nothing, without the help of anyone. It is a cultural model widespread in America and in Anglo-Saxon countries, which exalts the value of personal commitment, willpower, and determination. But does the self-made man really exist? Or is it just an illusion that hides a more complex and nuanced reality?
The concept of the self-made man emerged in the United States in the 19th century, in a historical context characterized by the frontier, territorial expansion, and industrial development. In this scenario, many men from humble backgrounds or immigrants from other countries managed to build a fortune and a reputation thanks to their talent, initiative, and ability to adapt to challenges. Some famous examples include Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Carnegie, and Henry Ford.
The self-made man thus becomes a symbol of the American Dream, the possibility of achieving one’s goals regardless of one’s social, economic, or ethnic background. It is an idea that also exerts a strong appeal in other countries, such as Italy, where the culture of merit and autonomy is often contrasted with that of privilege and welfare.
However, the self-made man is also the subject of numerous criticisms, which question its validity and truthfulness. Some of these criticisms include:
The self-made man promotes an individualistic, competitive, and narcissistic vision of society, where the common good is sacrificed to the personal one, where success is measured only in material terms, and where failure is stigmatized as a fault or shame. This vision can generate anxiety, depression, isolation, and violence, as well as increase social inequalities and injustices.
I argue that some of these considerations, in the era of global digitalization, can be easily reassessed with a positive connotation, not just critical.
Faced with these criticisms, it is necessary to reconsider the concept of the self-made man, going beyond its most superficial and stereotyped connotation. Instead of denying or glorifying the self-made man, one can try to reinterpret it in a more balanced and realistic key, taking into account all the elements that influence a person’s journey. In this sense, we can speak of a self-made man who is:
Human, promoting an integrated, harmonious, and sustainable vision of society, where success is also measured in terms of quality of life, happiness, and well-being, and where failure is accepted as an opportunity for learning and growth.
In conclusion, the self-made man is not a myth to be debunked, but to be renewed, in order to make it more adherent to reality and more beneficial to the society we live in today. In the era of the possibility to earn or create a business simply by holding a cell phone or having access to a computer, the myth of the self-made man is more present than ever before.
Every day we hear stories of individuals, especially from Gen Z, who have been able to realize themselves thanks to the digital world, achieving their life and economic goals.
What do you think? Has the self-made man remained a myth or is it still alive in today’s world?